.<\/span><\/p>\nUnfortunately, even after such extensive testing, much of the research doesn’t reach approval. The deaths of these animals reap no results.<\/span><\/p>\n6. One critical change to cosmetic animal testing, the facts show, was the Australian Industrial Chemicals Act, which passed the Senate in 2017.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(SMH)<\/span><\/p>\nAlthough this doesn\u2019t prohibit all animal testing for cosmetics, it bans any results from data gathered via animal testing after July 1, 2018.<\/span><\/p>\nThis may not mean that testing on animals for cosmetics will ultimately end. However, the act will limit and reduce it dramatically.<\/span><\/p>\n7. Animal testing facts and statistics reveal that 41% of people in the UK think organizations that engage in animal testing are secretive.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Ipsos)<\/span><\/p>\nCurrently, only 32% of people feel they work in organizations that engage in animal testing is necessary for human health. In general, there’s minimal transparency about what happens behind the closed doors of animal testing facilities.<\/span><\/p>\nThis leads to people feeling uneasy about what they don’t see. Without knowing what these companies are doing and what these tests uncover, it’s easy to understand why more people prefer alternative options to animal testing.<\/span><\/p>\nAnimal Testing Pros and Cons: Facts and Stats<\/b><\/h2>\n
As much as we would like to say that animal testing is all bad, there are some benefits of animal testing, and these facts clearly show it.<\/span><\/p>\nThere are many animal testing cons. But, in the past, it’s proven to be very beneficial for humans, the environment, and animals as well.<\/span><\/p>\nAnimal testing articles show that scientists have found cures and treatments for major diseases and illnesses that otherwise would not have been possible through animal testing.<\/span><\/p>\nThis, however, was at a time when no possible alternatives were available. Today many experiments do not necessarily require animals. Many other tests on animals have proven to be useless due to their inaccuracy.<\/span><\/p>\n8. 47% of people accept animals in research for medical purposes.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Speaking of Research)<\/span><\/p>\nAnimal testing statistics for 2021 show the number is the same as when individuals have asked the same question a couple of years ago. However, more people nowadays oppose animal testing compared to a couple of years ago.<\/span><\/p>\nFor the most part, people aren’t aware of precisely what happens behind the closed doors in the labs, and most likely, they prefer it that way.<\/span><\/p>\n9. Interesting facts about animal testing reveal that mice’s lifespan is 2\u20133 years.\u00a0<\/b><\/h3>\n
(The Jackson Laboratory)<\/span><\/p>\nThis makes them necessary for life cycle studies that are otherwise impossible in human testing.<\/span><\/p>\nThe average lifespan of a human can be anywhere between 70 and 80 years of age. This makes it very difficult, if not impossible, for researchers to study and experiment with how a drug or chemical will affect a human’s life cycle.<\/span><\/p>\nThis is why the use of mice is very effective\u2014their shorter lives provide the opportunity to do long-term research across an entire life cycle.<\/span><\/p>\n10. One of the significant animal testing facts reminds us that scientists have found treatments for numerous diseases by testing on animals.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Penny Saviour)<\/span><\/p>\nAs painful as the numbers are to read about animals’ treatment and death during animal testing, some unarguable results couldn’t be achieved without it.<\/span><\/p>\nMany scientists confirm that there wouldn’t be vaccines without animal testing medications for heart disease, cancer treatment, and even life-saving transplants.<\/span><\/p>\nApproximately 70% of the Nobel Prize winners for medicine and physiology made their discoveries through animal research.<\/span><\/p>\n11. Stats on animal testing show how the polio vaccine, which was initially tested on animals, vastly reduced the disease’s occurrence rate.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(WHO)<\/span><\/p>\nThrough animal testing, scientists were able to develop this life-saving vaccine. There were approximately 350,000 occurrences of polio in 1988. With the vaccine’s help, this number was reduced to just 33 cases of polio in 2018.<\/span><\/p>\nThe cases continue to go down with every passing year.<\/span><\/p>\n12. The Covid-19 pandemic showed that scientists can skip animal testing.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Procon)<\/span><\/p>\nAnimal experimentation statistics show that thousands of animals endure incredible pain during testing. Researchers were able to test and develop efficient vaccines with the help of human volunteers.<\/span><\/p>\n13. Stats about animal testing reveal that the Animal Welfare Act doesn’t protect 95% of the animals being tested on.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Procon)<\/span><\/p>\nThe majority of the animals used for research are birds, fish, mice, and rats, none of which are protected by the AWA.<\/span><\/p>\nStatistics reveal that just over 820,000 animals used for research are covered by the AWA. According to this percentage, approximately 25 million animals are left unprotected, leading to potential abuse and mistreatment.<\/span><\/p>\nThere is also very little transparency about the treatment of these animals.<\/span><\/p>\nStatistics on Animal Testing Costs<\/b><\/h2>\n
The amount of money that goes toward animal testing and experiments is jaw-dropping, to say the least. Unfortunately, most of the money invested doesn’t lead to many new results. Most of the time, the final product doesn’t get approved.<\/span><\/p>\nMost people don’t know that most animal testing done for educational purposes is paid for by taxpayers.<\/span><\/p>\n14. The cost of registering one pesticide is $3 million.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(HSI)<\/span><\/p>\nAnimal testing stats show that it takes nearly a decade, thousands of animals\u2019 deaths, and money to register a pesticide.\u00a0 The cost of registering a single pesticide with the US Environmental Protection Agency costs millions of dollars.<\/span><\/p>\nIn many cases, the money and animals\u2019 lives lost while attempting to register a single pesticide are fruitless\u2014a minimal number pass the necessary requirements and get registered.<\/span><\/p>\n15. Every year, more than $12 billion in taxpayer money is wasted on research that involves animals.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(PETA)<\/span><\/p>\nStatistics of animal testing show the University of Utah gets, on average, $500,000 to induce heart attacks in dogs. Northeastern University receives some $300,000 to inject hamsters with steroids and make them fight.<\/span><\/p>\nAnd that’s not all. Oregon Health and Science University gets a staggering $1.6 million to turn monkeys and mice into alcoholics. In comparison, the NIH receives $1.7 million to induce depression in baby monkeys.<\/span><\/p>\nFurthermore, PETA revealed that the government could provide $210 a month to food-insecure seniors with this money. They could also hire additional 300,000 teachers or provide $715 a month to 1.4 million homeless veterans.<\/span><\/p>\nAnimal Testing Statistics in the US<\/b><\/h2>\n
The US continues to use animals for experimentation, even though they’re also the leaders in finding the best alternatives to such cruel testing.<\/span><\/p>\nThere is an exciting contrast between the companies that test on animals regardless of the available alternatives and the companies conscious of animal cruelty that have already taken steps to eliminate it altogether.<\/span><\/p>\n16. Statistics about animal testing show that as many as 100 million animals die from this annually in the US alone.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(PETA)<\/span><\/p>\nThe animals suffer through many experiments before dying in cruel food, drug, cosmetics, and chemical tests. These numbers include the animals that die in dissection and classroom biology experiments.<\/span><\/p>\nIn many cases where animals have been used, there are already advanced non-animal experimentation options available.<\/span><\/p>\nThey’re proven to save time and money and offer more educational value while reducing animal suffering and death.<\/span><\/p>\n17. Recent animal testing statistics show that 52% of Americans feel testing on animals for medical purposes isn\u2019t acceptable.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(PETA)<\/span><\/p>\nA survey has revealed that regardless of the numerous alternatives available, close to half of Americans still feel that testing on animals is morally acceptable. Conversely, 52% feel that testing on animals is ethically wrong.<\/span><\/p>\n18. 171.406 guinea pigs were used for animal research in the US, as animal testing facts show.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Speaking of Research)<\/span><\/p>\nThese numbers can\u2019t be 100% accurate due to the lack of transparency in many testing facilities. The statistics further reveal that the second most common animal used for testing in the US in 2018 was the rabbit, with 133,634 animals.<\/span><\/p>\nAll other AWA-covered species totaled 182,580. Sheep had the lowest numbers, at 13,000. Sadly,<\/span> cats were also the victims of testing<\/span><\/a> at 18,619.<\/span><\/p>\n19. In 2020, California used more cats for research than any other state.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Procon)<\/span><\/p>\nStatistics for animal testing show the state abused 1,682 cats for testing in 2020. Moreover, Ohio used the most guinea pigs \u2014 35,206. Finally, Massachusetts used the most dogs and primates \u2014 6,771 and 11,795, respectively.<\/span><\/p>\nMany people think animal testing is only on rabbits and rats in cages. Still, cats, dogs, and primates are regularly used to test medications, cosmetics, chemicals, and more.<\/span><\/p>\n20. In the case of cosmetic testing on animals, statistics reveal that if the animal isn\u2019t killed during testing, it\u2019s killed when the experiment ends.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Humane Society)<\/span><\/p>\nWhen it comes to cosmetic testing on animals, articles show a grim picture.<\/span><\/p>\nNot only do animals suffer through these experiments, but if they do survive, they\u2019re then killed through decapitation, neck-breaking, or asphyxiation. No pain relief is provided throughout the experiments, nor when they\u2019re killed.<\/span><\/p>\nThere’s no protection for most animals. Many don’t even count toward the high numbers of animals used for experimentation since they aren’t covered by the Animal Welfare Act.<\/span><\/p>\n21. When engaging in animal testing, statistics from 2019 reveal that these tests’ failure rate is greater than 90%.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Green Garage Blog)<\/span><\/p>\nThis failure rate is across all industries, which includes cosmetics. In the pharmaceutical industry, the failure rate is at least 96%.<\/span><\/p>\nThis reveals that there are little to no results coming out of thousands of animals’ continuous torture and death yearly, with only a tiny percentage of the products reaching the market.<\/span><\/p>\nRegardless of these staggering statistics, the United States, and many other countries, still feel the need to use all types of animal testing, ignoring many other non-animal alternatives.<\/span><\/p>\n22. The US is among the leading users of animals for testing.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Cruelty Free International)<\/span><\/p>\nAnimal testing statistics from 2020 reveal China is a worldwide leader, with over 20 million animals known for research and testing. Japan and the US are close behind, with 15 million animals used for experiments.<\/span><\/p>\nIn the European Union, the UK, Germany, and France are leaders in animal testing.<\/span><\/p>\n23. The EPA notes that by 2025 there will be a 30% reduction in the number of studies using animal testing.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(NY Times)<\/span><\/p>\nAndrew Wheeler, the E.P.A. Administrator, believes animal testing should be banned. His goal is to eliminate animal testing using mammals by 2035, with some case-based approvals.<\/span><\/p>\nThe agency has also promised to invest at least $4.25 million into developing alternatives to using animals to test chemicals.<\/span><\/p>\nAnimal Testing Statistics Worldwide<\/b><\/h2>\n
On a global scale, animal testing is challenging to control and track. Many countries have different requirements for the allowed number of animals in labs, animal protection laws, and principles.<\/span><\/p>\nOne thing\u2019s for sure, the numbers aren\u2019t going down. In fact, they\u2019re increasing, even with the many available alternatives that can make testing on animals obsolete.<\/span><\/p>\nWith a worldwide ban on animal testing for cosmetics in the works by the EU and more companies becoming concerned with animal rights, there’s hope yet.<\/span><\/p>\n24. Statistic of animal testing reveals no evident decline in the number of animal experiments.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Cruelty Free International)<\/span><\/p>\nAlthough many alternatives have been found, and many tests are proven useless, animal testing has not declined. In China, the use of animals for experimentation has increased.<\/span><\/p>\nAnd in Europe, the numbers are nearly the same as they were during the 1980s and 1990s.<\/span><\/p>\n25. 2,785 dogs and 1,306 monkeys were used for dose toxicity tests in Europe in one year alone.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Cruelty Free International)<\/span><\/p>\nThe animals are given doses of drugs that cause many ongoing side effects from two weeks to nine months.<\/span><\/p>\nNevertheless, scientists against animal testing have revealed facts that prove these tests are ineffective in showing drug toxicity levels in humans.<\/span><\/p>\n26. In 2018, 123 skin irritation tests were done on rabbits in the UK.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Cruelty Free International)<\/span><\/p>\nThere are many experiments for toxicological testing that have approved non-animal alternatives.<\/span><\/p>\nHowever, these animal-based tests were still being conducted in the UK in 2018, with 40 eye irritation tests, 10,275 acute lethal toxicity tests, and 638 pyrogenicity experiments on live rabbits.<\/span><\/p>\nThis proves that governments and companies overlook the available alternatives and still opt for harmful and inhumane testing on animals.<\/span><\/p>\n27. 56% of animal experimentation is for basic research.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Cruelty Free International)<\/span><\/p>\nEach year, about 1.8 million experiments in the UK use animals. Animal experiments facts show that approximately one million are for basic research. University researchers and their curiosity drive the majority of these.<\/span><\/p>\nAs more than 50% of all the tests are done in universities, most of the funding comes from taxpayers. As per these statistics, only 13% of the experiments done on animals are actually required by regulators.<\/span><\/p>\n28. 85% of the monkeys used for experiments in the EU were imported from outside the region.<\/b><\/h3>\n
(Cruelty Free International)<\/span><\/p>\n